Re:Use GNU Emacs
by oliverbennett on Friday March 03, 2023 @04:57AM
(#35007687)
Both metaphors seem apt. One is leaning towards how a product makes a person feel when using it, one is about what the product offers.
I hear arguments around what products can offer me all the time, they make sense, but I generally go with how a product makes me feel. Probably more than I even realise.
I don’t use Emacs, I do whisk eggs and fish doughnuts out of oil with chopsticks, I couldn’t fully say why for either.
oh i get it and i will contradict my own saying "you dont need GPU for handling source code" when i talk about my personal projects, but there is a time and a place for all the tools there are: some have janky handles, some have single-purpose nibs, others are as customizable as your regular homeowners house.
i am still a bit iffy about emacslisp, but less so than before i grokked CL (thanks for that goes to "practical common lisp" by peter seibel)
but: whatever floats your boat will keep your boat afloat :D
As a westerner, chopsticks are much better than spoons or forks at getting that last grain of rice in the plate, or a small piece of salad.
They’re also great for eating Cheetos without getting orange residue on your fingers. :)
Re:Use GNU Emacs
by slowmovintarget on Friday March 03, 2023 @11:29AM
(#35011700)
Or eating vegetables like sauteed kale, or string beans.
I will admit that for that very last teaspoon full of rice, though... I grab a spoon.
you use emacs to do stuff, you dont just listen to/watch it do its thing.
chopsticks might not seem like a good metaphor at first glance, as they are much more simple, but they are highly compatible with a lot of tasks and can be utilized in many ways that a fork, spoon, spork or colander just wouldnt handle as well. to my mind, the simple thing hidden in emacs' complexity is that it is a closeted lisp machine