EU will require Apple to open up iMessage

Re:EU will require Apple to open up iMessage by afiori on Thursday March 02, 2023 @11:47AM (#34998150)

Also I am quite sure that such a law would be unconstitutional in a lot of places.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU will require Apple to open up iMessage by harywilke on Thursday March 02, 2023 @12:47PM (#34999098)

yup. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_of_attainder

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU will require Apple to open up iMessage by int_19h on Thursday March 02, 2023 @03:47PM (#35001816)

It would only be a bill of attainder if it used arbitrary characteristics not relevant to the stated purpose of the bill to target specific companies. The definition cited is not arbitrary in that sense - it targets large companies in specific markets, and there's an obvious rational connection with the stated purpose.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU will require Apple to open up iMessage by afiori on Friday March 03, 2023 @05:30AM (#35007880)

I believe that both comment are trying to say that:

- Google and Apple must do X => unconstitutional

- All Companies bigger than X with chat-like apps and an app store and a near-oligopoly OS must do X => probably constitutional

- All Companies such that (proceed to list dozen of random characteristics meant to only ever apply to Google and Apple ) must do X => probably unconstitutional

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU will require Apple to open up iMessage by bryanrasmussen on Thursday March 02, 2023 @02:50PM (#35000948)

yes, although I didn't want to specifically say this was the case in EU as I'm not sure. But probably is.

[ Parent | on HN ]