Re:All you may need is HTML
by kerkeslager on Thursday March 02, 2023 @01:22PM
(#34999584)
> I agree with you, but also I think the section tag is one of the biggest leaps forward we've had. Putting an id on a whole section instead of a name= crap for references, and actually using nesting for hierarchy.
How does this differ from how <div> was being used before?
I've switched to using <section> simply because it's a better name, but I'm not sure it's made any meaningful difference in my code.
> All the HTML5 input types are also an example of semantics impriving. It could be way better, but it's not a total stalemate
That's true, but I think we'd be moving forward a lot more quickly if we weren't devoting most of standards development resources toward giving companies more fine-grained control of our browsers through CSS/JS.
Re:All you may need is HTML
by GoblinSlayer on Friday March 03, 2023 @02:30AM
(#35006826)
My e-book reader shows <em> text with teal color and I like it, it's better visible than italic and the font remains upright and readable, I doubt it will be comfortable to read lots of text in italic. I didn't notice any discrepancy with <i>. But for some reason <strong> doesn't override <em> and they multiply, though I saw it used once when an exclamation was repeated several times with increasing emphasis for extra dramatism.
All the HTML5 input types are also an example of semantics impriving. It could be way better, but it's not a total stalemate