Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry
by Zurrrrr on Wednesday March 01, 2023 @08:32PM
(#34990795)
You got to try extra hard to come up with this idiocy lol.
Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry
by yesenadam on Thursday March 02, 2023 @12:41AM
(#34992412)
* * *
Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry
by Zurrrrr on Thursday March 02, 2023 @12:57AM
(#34992510)
Thanks for your input.
Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry
by yesenadam on Thursday March 02, 2023 @01:04AM
(#34992559)
No problem, I'm sure it's not just me who felt that. Also, please consider that even if you were totally right about everything and everyone you interacted with totally wrong, that would be no justification at all for the way you've carried on on this page.
Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry
by Zurrrrr on Thursday March 02, 2023 @01:35AM
(#34992740)
Thanks for letting me know.
Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry
by riatin on Thursday March 02, 2023 @12:15AM
(#34992265)
Sure, let's change it to that. Does talking about "Christian fundamentalists" make you more comfortable than talking about "Native Americans"?
Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry
by bigDinosaur on Thursday March 02, 2023 @12:26AM
(#34992314)
It doesn't seem difficult to find groups that reject science when it conflicts with their beliefs. Doesn't this make a stronger case for the person to whom you're replying? Humans are far from avoiding appeals to emotion, and that's doubly true for politically charged topics, which this very much is.
I mean, if we are going to make these kinds of broad generalizations and comparisons, could we at least change “Native Americans” to “Christian fundamentalists”.
It’s not any less true.