* * *
Re:The End of the English Major
by Apocryphon on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:05PM
(#34972609)
I was dismissing the previous post that claimed that "more readable" - less "convoluted" - 19th century texts existed by saying such texts are probably not worth reading, as the much more complex works are heralded as classics of English literature.
Re:The End of the English Major
by jeffjobs4000 on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @01:26PM
(#34972881)
I find this passage to be far more readable than the Scarlet Letter one posted above. Sure, it's long, but it's developing the character.
Before screens, people must have gotten far more enjoyment from authors painting mental pictures in tiny detail.
We have HD video as an option now. A long description of a rose bush doesn't do it for me unless it's needed for the actual narrative.
Re:The End of the English Major
by SyzygistSix on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @04:45PM
(#34975304)
What is different about literature is that things are being described through the viewpoints of particular people.
> But unless they're Mark Twain or Ambrose Bierce, they're probably not much worth reading.
I strongly disagree. Being convoluted does not make the text more worth reading. It makes it more fun for one kind of reader. That is about it.
Being well written and pleasant to read does not make the text, whether fiction or real like account less worthy.
Re:The End of the English Major
by Apocryphon on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @03:33PM
(#34974427)
Right, but much great writing from that era was convoluted, like the work of Herman Melville.
Sure there are. But unless they're Mark Twain or Ambrose Bierce, they're probably not much worth reading.