Re:Minimum Viable Hugo – No CSS, no JavaScript, 1 static HTM...
by crecker on Monday February 27, 2023 @04:13PM
(#34961935)
Bep is rewriting the docs because are really incomprehensible. I do agree with you.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Minimum Viable Hugo – No CSS, no JavaScript, 1 static HTM...
by yawpitch on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @05:16AM
(#34967700)
Four years ago Bep was rewriting the docs because they were incomprehensible (https://yawpitchroll.com/posts/hugo-probably-is-not-for-you/... last week I started looking again, and I wouldn’t say anything has improved, nor do I expect it to in 4 more.
Re:Minimum Viable Hugo – No CSS, no JavaScript, 1 static HTM...
by pooper on Tuesday February 28, 2023 @06:41AM
(#34968239)
Note to reader: the link is mangled up a little I think because of the closing parentheses? Here is a link without parentheses
https://yawpitchroll.com/posts/hugo-probably-is-not-for-you/