News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Minimum Viable Hugo – No CSS, no JavaScript, 1 static HTM... by hk1337 on Monday February 27, 2023 @12:39PM (#34959418)
Blasphemy! I must overcomplicate it so the build takes a significant amount of time in the CI workflow. /s
Re:Minimum Viable Hugo – No CSS, no JavaScript, 1 static HTM... by doodlesdev on Monday February 27, 2023 @02:29PM (#34960782)
Hugo builds and Jekyll builds are basically instantaneous even for really large websites. I mean less than one second. Like 30ms. You don't even see it happen. Migrating your manually crafted HTML pages to something other than NGINX or changing the theme or website is going to be such a pain in the ass you're going to wish you never thought of this "minimalist" way of doing it. If you look at the website of the guy above at superkuh.com it looks like shit (subjective, of course), doesn't even have a TLS certificate and above all would be an extreme pain to change the layout, design, deployment, etc. I don't even know what to say about this chart in his last post at http://erewhon.superkuh.com/pictures/blog-posts-vs-blog-post... although I must admit it's really funny.