Re:Plastic-based fuels may present an “unreasonable risk” to...
by littlestymaar on Monday February 27, 2023 @11:21AM
(#34958232)
All over-packaging plastic use aren't at all related to paying more. In fact, it costs more to put additional plastic wraps around product to make “bundles” …
Re:Plastic-based fuels may present an “unreasonable risk” to...
by mrtranscendence on Monday February 27, 2023 @11:26AM
(#34958303)
If the bundling prevents breakage, which prevents customer support requests / returns ...
Re:Plastic-based fuels may present an “unreasonable risk” to...
by dsfyu404ed on Monday February 27, 2023 @11:46AM
(#34958618)
Generally speaking when you see some boring industry with margins too tiny to indulge in cargo cutting doing something it's because that something offers measurable (and therefore quantifiable, unlike wishy-washy subjective stuff like "brand image") improvement to the bottom line, usually by undercutting competition.
Re:Plastic-based fuels may present an “unreasonable risk” to...
by dweinus on Monday February 27, 2023 @01:18PM
(#34959965)
I think you're both right: the current global level of consumption not sustainable, or necessary. Everybody wants a healthy planet, almost nobody wants to volunteer to consume less. Regulation is needed, and it will mean we have to consume less. I realize that's not what anyone wants to hear. On top of that, I think we need social safety nets that prevent the burden from simply crushing the poor while the rich continue to over-consume. In the climate crisis we are trying to pay off generations worth of CO2 debt and we haven't even stopped digging the hole deeper yet.
All your other points are essentially "If you paid way more, then plastic wouldn't be necessary." However, if you paid more, then you'd have less money for other stuff. So clearly plastic is necessary for our current levels of consumption.