But they were not good shoes. They had tracking devices put into them. Full stop.
Imagine putting tracking devices into children's shoes and then having them "reused" like this.
Yes, reuse is great. And if that's what they said they were going to do, awesome. But that's not what happened here, and exposes a very real problem.
>The donated shoes that ended up in Indonesia have added to a flood of illegal second-hand clothing pouring into that developing country, according to a senior government official there, who said such cast-offs pose a public health risk, undercut its local textile industry and often pile more waste into its already bulging landfills.
> who said such cast-offs pose a public health risk
Obviously phony.
> undercut its local textile industry
Free stuff is better than having a local industry. The government can tax shoe wearers to pay the local industry to make more stuff or just relax.
> often pile more waste into its already bulging landfills.
That one is legit.
Yes, it's bad that this was advertised as a specific recycling program and involved parties knowingly or unknowingly diverged from that stated plan.
But from a global resource consumption perspective, it's far preferable to re-use good shoes (which also reduces the production of new shoes) than to recycle them for recovered material (which is lossy in terms of energy and materials).
The same argument about shoes may not apply to the specifics of say e-waste - where harmful materials, rare materials, or electrical efficiency come into play - but in the case of this article, we should be happy that usable shoes are being put on feet rather than shredded and chemically decomposed.