News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by recuter on Friday February 24, 2023 @12:29PM (#34927071)
I don't know what my bias is supposed to be but I called them dorks affectionately for one. The other replies are literally arguing that they are very extremely supervised where as I am speculating they are just eager to share their work for the right reasons and the eye of Sauron has yet to turn upon them.

Inside knowledge I never claimed. Anything else I can help you with today? :)

Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by rcpt on Friday February 24, 2023 @01:59PM (#34928433)
> I called them dorks affectionately

Never in my life have I seen that word used affectionately

Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by vidarh on Friday February 24, 2023 @02:30PM (#34928881)
I have seen that many times, as well as seeing people use it about themselves.
Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by sebastiennight on Friday February 24, 2023 @05:18PM (#34930943)
I think Noah Kagan's blog is literally called "OK Dork", and I always assumed the title was self-deprecating (in a fun/positive way) rather than negative.
Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by drusepth on Friday February 24, 2023 @08:49PM (#34932919)
Geek, nerd, and dork can all be used positively/affectionately. I know I've called myself and friends all of the above on many occasions.
Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by alibero on Saturday February 25, 2023 @12:30AM (#34934178)
As one of the unsupervised dorks working on LLMs at Meta (not one of the authors here) I took it in a positive way :)
Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by recuter on Saturday February 25, 2023 @02:31AM (#34934697)
Thank you for your service meatbag <3