Then you should be quite aware she doesn’t believe half the random shit she spouts on twitter, including this. It’s greatly exaggerated for clout chasing.

Most of her twitter seems sincere, where does she indicate most of it isn't?

Or is this one of those convenient excuses people make, like "it's just a joke bro!"

Nuance doesn’t work on twitter. It’s part of the game. She’s on there to get clicks to spread her personal and company brand.

“I take you more seriously on matters of architecture if you’re committing code on a regular basis and on the pager duty rotation. Some architects are really good and many are bad or detrimental.”

Is not a take that gets quote tweeted or posted on hacker news.

This more or less describes a lot of how I view software industry Twitter.

Tweet threads on topics like this are rarely deep and thoughtfully considered, and when they are, an article or blog post would always be a better format.

That's not what i expect when i see someone on twitter linking the CTO role in their bio.

You have your assumptions inverted my friend

i don't think that's true, given that these are the same things she says on her blog and on the honeycomb blog

The consistency indicates preparedness, not candor.