Re:Apple Orders Entire Supply of TSMC's 3nm Chips for iPhone...
by wewtyflakes on Wednesday February 22, 2023 @11:37AM
(#34898212)
Customers care about this:
> Battery life was a good few hours shorter than the M1
They do not care about this:
> ...but it was also manufactured on 7nm versus the Apple's 5nm
Re:Apple Orders Entire Supply of TSMC's 3nm Chips for iPhone...
by smoldesu on Wednesday February 22, 2023 @04:01PM
(#34902662)
I agree. It's worth noting that the 4800u was on store shelves 18 months before the first M1s were released, however. Apple Silicon was released into a market that had had already seen comparable APUs.
Re:Apple Orders Entire Supply of TSMC's 3nm Chips for iPhone...
by freehorse on Wednesday February 22, 2023 @06:44PM
(#34904778)
> similar power envelope
Power envelopes are reported in very misleading ways by companies, in practice it is not even close. The way they report stuff is having their cake and eat it too: the benchmarks results assume boosting their frequencies above the base one, while the "power envelopes" advertised are on the base frequency. It becomes quite apparent when you run them on battery, where M1/2s continue performing the same as plugged in, and amd/intel laptops underperform, while also not even lasting as much as apple's on battery.
If you need further evidence of this pattern, look at Nvidia's ridiculous 40-series cards. More expensive than a used car, but they were able to secure TSMC's 4nm node and annihilate everyone else. Apple did the same thing with M1, and it looks like that's what they're gearing up for with M3.