Re:Windows drops to No. 3 cash-cow status in Microsoft' late...
by dangrossman on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:16PM
(#3487400)
Visual Studio is part of that Server and Tools division's $4.8 billion in revenue.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Windows drops to No. 3 cash-cow status in Microsoft' late...
by jackfoxy on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:47PM
(#3487519)
I suspected as much, but how much of that $4.8?
Re:Windows drops to No. 3 cash-cow status in Microsoft' late...
by dangrossman on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:58PM
(#3487567)
I don't think they ever directly publish that, but they did publish in 2010, producers of Visual Studio extensions brought in over $400 million in revenue. Considering the people buying those extensions have a full version of Visual Studio, and the cost of VS and MSDN subscriptions, I would not be surprised if those two things account for most of that $5 billion.
Re:Windows drops to No. 3 cash-cow status in Microsoft' late...
by kevin_morrill on Thursday January 19, 2012 @11:46PM
(#3488368)
Definitely not true. I am a former employee who worked on Visual Studio.
Visual Studio is close to a $1 billion business. The lion's share of the Server and Tools Division is licenses for Windows Server and SQL Server.
Re:Windows drops to No. 3 cash-cow status in Microsoft' late...
by famousactress on Thursday January 19, 2012 @07:12PM
(#3487619)
Wow. In that case, it seems like it ought to be tempting to double the cost of Visual Studio and give non-business copies of Windows away.