Re:Meta’s testing $12 per month paid verification on Instagr...
by CharlesW on Sunday February 19, 2023 @01:15PM
(#34860223)
> By removing the very politically-biased censorship…
About that…¹²³
¹ https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/25/23571103/elon-musk-twitte...
² https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/16/tech/musk-censors-press/index...
³ https://theintercept.com/2022/11/22/elon-musk-twitter-censor...
Re:Meta’s testing $12 per month paid verification on Instagr...
by throwaway69123 on Sunday February 19, 2023 @07:29PM
(#34863468)
Musk said they would comply with the laws of each country how is this inconsistent with that statement?
Re:Meta’s testing $12 per month paid verification on Instagr...
by vxNsr on Sunday February 19, 2023 @11:41PM
(#34864966)
The first link is just straight speculation and bad reporting as it shows the authors disdain and bias for the subject matter. The second link is even worse beginning with an editorialization of “thin skinned” the whole rest of the article is moot. We can’t know if any of it is accurate if the author starts off with such bias against the very subject of the article. The third link has nothing to do with Elon. It’s a low profile block of an account that was breaking multiple laws. Not sure what you expect there.
Re:Meta’s testing $12 per month paid verification on Instagr...
by ElevenLathe on Sunday February 19, 2023 @01:23PM
(#34860291)
I'm sure dumping millions of users suddenly into the equivalent of /b/ will be a politically neutral change. /s
Unfortunately it isn't possible to have an unmoderated forum. Choosing not to moderate is still a moderation choice.
Re:Meta’s testing $12 per month paid verification on Instagr...
by mc32 on Sunday February 19, 2023 @02:37PM
(#34861012)
He did but we see both the liberal and autocratic governments of the world lament that they wish Elon would be open to government censorship.
By removing the very politically-biased censorship he already did a very healthy move for the whole world.