News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI won’t make artists redundant – thanks to information t... by bryanrasmussen on Sunday February 19, 2023 @11:48AM (#34859214)
>The human impact is real, but how is it different from how carriage drivers felt about the automobile, or how typists felt about the word processor?

it's probably different in the way that the parent poster described, that artists found drawing an emotionally satisfying process whereas people typing probably didn't think setting styles in MS Word made them complete.

Re:AI won’t make artists redundant – thanks to information t... by DennisP on Sunday February 19, 2023 @12:08PM (#34859482)
People who have never found their paid work so emotionally satisfying are worse off, not better. At least professional artists have gotten to spend some of their working lives that way.
Re:AI won’t make artists redundant – thanks to information t... by philippejara on Sunday February 19, 2023 @09:32PM (#34864316)
there is nothing stopping them from doing the thing that "makes them complete" for leisure like most other people. AI art doesn't stop you from drawing, it might very well impact the commercial viability of it for sure but all that's lost is that.
Re:AI won’t make artists redundant – thanks to information t... by jhbadger on Monday February 20, 2023 @11:13AM (#34869481)
Exactly. People play chess, even though computers can beat anyone these days. Or participate in track events even though cars and airplanes are vastly faster than a runner on foot.