Re:AI won’t make artists redundant – thanks to information t...
by bamboozled on Sunday February 19, 2023 @09:02AM
(#34857628)
I saw almost no "raging" though? Yeah obviously concerned about the future of her profession and some difficult questions asked about IP theft and copyright, but that's about it?
Edit: There is some raging in the replies but it's twitter and everyone is raging on there.
There was some raging about Netflix using "AI" to generate backgrounds for a cartoon, but ultimately everyone will lose, including Netflix if this really is very automated, Almost anyone will soon be able to create a Netflix so I'll just cancel my subscription and watch free generated content uploaded to Youtube I guess?
Re:AI won’t make artists redundant – thanks to information t...
by UncleEntity on Sunday February 19, 2023 @11:00AM
(#34858669)
> Almost anyone will soon be able to create a Netflix so I'll just cancel my subscription and watch free generated content uploaded to Youtube I guess?
What’s wrong with that?
I pretty much only watch people doing their thing on YouTube and I’m entertained enough. I have a couple years of tv shows I haven’t gotten around to watching because of YouTube peeps keeping me interested.
Re:AI won’t make artists redundant – thanks to information t...
by bamboozled on Sunday February 19, 2023 @07:26PM
(#34863445)
Nothing but it's interesting that while Netflix is pushing forwards to replace their staff with AI generated content, they're also pushing closer to a world where a large part of their value add is obsolete.
A group of individuals who will use AI as an augmentation, even people with inferior drawing skills but able to get better results faster, a man with an excavator replaces several people with a shovel.
I'd love to see these raging artist discussions? Can you link a few?
I'm not OP but Twitter is full, you can start from @kortizart and find all kinds of account of people who are illustrators but now only rage against AI art.