Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl's books

Re:Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl... by nonethewiser on Saturday February 18, 2023 @09:22PM (#34853541)

Or, you know, ladies and gentleman

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl... by egonschiele on Saturday February 18, 2023 @10:26PM (#34853984)

I would guess the change was made because they felt ladies and gentlemen does not account for non-binary genders

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl... by Quarrelsome on Saturday February 18, 2023 @10:50PM (#34854146)

does that matter when there don't appear to be any non-binary people in any of Roald Dahls works?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl... by tohnjitor on Saturday February 18, 2023 @11:07PM (#34854266)

Oh my goodness how dare he!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl... by salawat on Sunday February 19, 2023 @04:52AM (#34856023)

Did you just assume their gender?

(I'll see myself out.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl... by type0 on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @06:46PM (#34889442)

they forgot the queers so it should have been "folx" in double-non-binary

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl... by gedy on Sunday February 19, 2023 @12:14AM (#34854719)

Goodness how could he assume that before asking their personal pronouns? /s

[ Parent | on HN ]