News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Internal review finds falsified data in Stanford President’s Alzheimer research. Parent comment

Re:Internal review finds falsified data in Stanford Presiden... by m348e912 on Saturday February 18, 2023 @08:09PM (#34853003)
I assume the fraudulent papers were the ones that claimed ivermectin was effective against covid?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Internal review finds falsified data in Stanford Presiden... by yyyk on Saturday February 18, 2023 @08:41PM (#34853213)
That was most of them. But I recall at least one deceptive Lancet paper arguing against ivermectin which was also fraudulent.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Internal review finds falsified data in Stanford Presiden... by pessimizer on Saturday February 18, 2023 @09:36PM (#34853640)
I think you're thinking of hydroxychloroquine, but your point stands.

Surgisphere: mass audit of papers linked to firm behind hydroxychloroquine Lancet study scandal

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/10/surgisphere-sa...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Internal review finds falsified data in Stanford Presiden... by refuse on Saturday February 18, 2023 @11:18PM (#34854335)
lol, the same journal that referred to women as "bodies with vaginas."
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Internal review finds falsified data in Stanford Presiden... by accuratitis on Sunday February 19, 2023 @12:13AM (#34854705)
Not sure why you are downvoted. They have bodies which sometimes have vaginas.

The clorox society police is out in full force on HN.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Internal review finds falsified data in Stanford Presiden... by sbaiddn on Saturday February 18, 2023 @08:36PM (#34853167)
Why would you assume that? You'd have to read a scientific paper to reach that conclusion (or do the experiment yourself) and the trustworthiness of that is what is at issue!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Internal review finds falsified data in Stanford Presiden... by gutitout on Saturday February 18, 2023 @08:34PM (#34853149)
You’re kidding, right?
[ Parent | on HN ]