News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How pervasive is corporate fraud? by tomrod on Saturday February 18, 2023 @10:33AM (#34847613)
What does this mean? I understand misclassification of contractors, but I've not hear of mischaracterizing of employees?
Re:How pervasive is corporate fraud? by analog31 on Saturday February 18, 2023 @10:42AM (#34847683)
If an employee is classified as "exempt," (aka, "salaried") then they are exempt from being paid overtime. There were recently a few articles on an increase in the number of workers being given artificial "manager" titles, to put them in the exempt category.

https://www.businessinsider.com/companies-may-give-fake-mana...

Edit: See comment below about "salaried." Thanks.

Re:How pervasive is corporate fraud? by danaris on Saturday February 18, 2023 @11:11AM (#34847954)
To be clear, "exempt" and "salaried" are not synonymous, even though they are very commonly treated as such.

It is perfectly possible to be a salaried employee, and to be eligible for overtime.

My interpretation: Companies just hate doing that, because it means trusting the employees to accurately report when they work overtime who are not regularly reporting their hours.

Re:How pervasive is corporate fraud? by vba616 on Sunday February 19, 2023 @03:03AM (#34855523)
Places I have worked mostly require salaried employees to report hours no matter what, whether or not they're even eligible for overtime.
Re:How pervasive is corporate fraud? by danaris on Sunday February 19, 2023 @08:19AM (#34857336)
I have been salaried for nearly 20 years now, and have never, in that time, been required to report my hours.
Re:How pervasive is corporate fraud? by analog31 on Sunday February 19, 2023 @02:04PM (#34860674)
The way it's worked for me is that I've been asked to report my hours when the information is being used to track how my time was divided among different projects. The ostensible purposes were to show that each project was receiving the its allocated share of resources. A secondary purpose was to see if anybody was being overworked -- for instance it could be used as evidence to justify hiring another person.

But we were told in no uncertain terms that we were not counting our hours. I'm sure the legal department had approved all of the verbiage and procedures.

I never personally measured my work in hours, and a lot of workers simply reported hours that precisely matched their project allocations, or copy-pasted from one week to the next. My present job doesn't have any of that.

Re:How pervasive is corporate fraud? by vba616 on Sunday February 19, 2023 @04:54PM (#34862246)
Some companies who do that have both salaried and overtime eligible hourly employees who are otherwise in the same type of position. Or they did at different points in time.

So the meaning of saying that it is not counting hours is as clear as mud.

It also extends to more than one industry. Not just, say, corporate litigation.

Re:How pervasive is corporate fraud? by vba616 on Sunday February 19, 2023 @03:01AM (#34855514)
My first office job was hourly, and paid overtime. For a short time, there was so much work we were allowed to do as much overtime as we liked. After a while we were told no overtime without permission, and then we were all changed (ostensibly) to exempt and salaried, but nobody said anything about us being "managers".

Now I am salaried, and am not allowed to put in overtime on my own initiative, but I am eligible for it if requested. The next salary grade up, union rules allow unpaid overtime.