Re:Did an F-22 Blow Up an Illinois Club’s Hobby Balloon?
by 7952 on Friday February 17, 2023 @02:34PM
(#34839267)
Those cost differences are striking. An adversary could launch thousands very cheaply. I wonder how militaries would react to so many potential targets.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Did an F-22 Blow Up an Illinois Club’s Hobby Balloon?
by taylodl on Friday February 17, 2023 @02:40PM
(#34839355)
In the worst case, you would react by directly attacking the adversary that launched them. Hopefully by the time things had reached that level you would have had an opportunity to exhaust all diplomatic channels and could have found a more peaceful resolution.
Re:Did an F-22 Blow Up an Illinois Club’s Hobby Balloon?
by madaxe_again on Friday February 17, 2023 @02:43PM
(#34839395)
With technical escalation.
Re:Did an F-22 Blow Up an Illinois Club’s Hobby Balloon?
by soylentcola on Friday February 17, 2023 @04:16PM
(#34840680)
Perhaps not so well when everyone's a Captain Kirk.
Re:Did an F-22 Blow Up an Illinois Club’s Hobby Balloon?
by mrguyorama on Friday February 17, 2023 @04:43PM
(#34840991)
Investment would lean back towards gun based AA, like anti-air artillery since the objects are so high. Investments are already going back into that direction as cheap drones like the SHAHED are easily managed affordably by systems like Gepard. It's actually quite fun to see these systems revived.
Re:Did an F-22 Blow Up an Illinois Club’s Hobby Balloon?
by Ancapistani on Friday February 17, 2023 @06:28PM
(#34842013)
I think laser-based weapons would be more likely, honestly. It should be possible to heat up a balloon enough to melt the envelope without an absurd power supply.