News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mildly interesting rant about Linux and Complexity by niels_olson on Thursday October 30, 2008 @12:12AM (#348419)
> Even new version of these operating systems still do not offer such a fundamental feature as working hibernate or other form of session saving.

Funny, on September 27th I closed the lid on my oversize-no-way-it's-going-to-travel-with-me Dell 9300, which now serves as my media center, running Ubuntu, and I left for a month. I came back, opened it up this morning, and it woke right up and asked for my password.

Re:Mildly interesting rant about Linux and Complexity by known on Thursday October 30, 2008 @06:30AM (#348601)
(1) Linux != Gnome or KDE

(2) Options = Freedom

And X is loosely coupled (hence no single point of failure). MS Windows is tightly coupled architecture (hence single point of failure) for your computer.

Re:Mildly interesting rant about Linux and Complexity by wmf on Thursday October 30, 2008 @04:13PM (#349123)
Linux != Gnome or KDE

That's precisely his complaint. New features are being created that aren't accessible from the command line (e.g. NetworkManager). You have to use GNOME/KDE.

Re:Mildly interesting rant about Linux and Complexity by wmf on Thursday October 30, 2008 @01:56AM (#348477)
Between this, Fedora's "who moved my X server?", and yet-another-Phonon-flamewar, this wasn't a good week for the Linux Hater to retire.
Re:Mildly interesting rant about Linux and Complexity by artificer on Thursday October 30, 2008 @03:20AM (#348528)
Just when we were contemplating the loss of our beloved linux hater...comes this one. Let's give the guy a warm welcome, shall we? ;-)
Re:Mildly interesting rant about Linux and Complexity by olefoo on Thursday October 30, 2008 @01:05AM (#348447)
This guy should look into OpenBSD, I get the sense he would either appreciate it's aesthetic or get into an argument with Theo.