Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts
by uxp100 on Friday February 17, 2023 @09:57AM
(#34835354)
This happened a month ago. The case settled, afaik.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts
by lesuorac on Friday February 17, 2023 @10:23AM
(#34835657)
It settled literally 2 days ago! That's pretty recent.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17292181/hunters-capita...
Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts
by Jacobinski on Friday February 17, 2023 @10:56AM
(#34836124)
How do these types of settlements usually work? Do the offending officials help pay for the settlement or are all the costs paid for using taxpayer money?
Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts
by lesuorac on Friday February 17, 2023 @01:06PM
(#34838126)
Typically the defendant is the City/ an agent of the City so the defendant (the City) pays.
Cities get a lot of money through taxes so one could say that it's paid for by taxpayers although it wouldn't be completely accurate as they have other revenue sources (fines, Federal money, etc).
Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts
by degrees57 on Friday February 17, 2023 @02:20PM
(#34839048)
Yes, generally the taxpayer pays. I work for a County local government. When we lose a case, we have our litigation insurance pay. Then the insurance policy rate immediately goes up.
Sometimes the government employee does something so agregious that we say "we cannot defend you: you are on your own" but that is really rare.