Re:To Neovim, or Not to Neovim. Tldr: Hell No
by fsociety on Saturday February 18, 2023 @04:11PM
(#34851133)
Honestly this article reinforces the value of neovim in my mind. I started with vi, then learned vim, then emacs, and now I am using neovim. The world of 2023 is different than the world of 1991, and neovim is an incredibly capable editor which is not forced upon anyone.
Re:To Neovim, or Not to Neovim. Tldr: Hell No
by lapinot on Monday February 20, 2023 @09:12AM
(#34868214)
tldr: old man yells at clouds. Irrationally conservative and arrogant. OP demonstrates quite handsomely how they don't understand anything about neovim nor the history of regexp.
Re:To Neovim, or Not to Neovim. Tldr: Hell No
by jeromescuggs on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @05:53PM
(#34888878)
as someone who uses neovim because all my pure rice vim plugins run soooo much smoother on neovim, i'm going to go out on a limb and say that he is dramatically overestimating the representation of his demographic among neovim and maybe even vim users.
i think i read the phrase "emacs envy" more than once, i just feel like OP has a very specific audience for this post in mind
Re:To Neovim, or Not to Neovim. Tldr: Hell No
by kzrdude on Thursday March 02, 2023 @03:50PM
(#35001855)
:shell is removed, but isn't :terminal a modern and in all ways a better replacement? You can have multiple terminals and put them in "tabs" or splits just like you do with buffers.
i think i read the phrase "emacs envy" more than once, i just feel like OP has a very specific audience for this post in mind