News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts by shadowgovt on Friday February 17, 2023 @09:36AM (#34835114)
Actually, this case is an excellent example of why that is probably a conspiracy theory that does not align with reality.
Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts by orangepurple on Friday February 17, 2023 @11:55AM (#34837104)
The term "conspiracy theory" is a psyop to auto-discredit anything labeled as one.
Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts by shadowgovt on Friday February 17, 2023 @12:06PM (#34837264)
That notion is just a conspiracy theory by Big Conspiracy to push more conspiracy theories. ;)
Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts by ceejayoz on Friday February 17, 2023 @01:28PM (#34838431)
Hilariously, this is a conspiracy theory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory#Origin_and_U...

> The earliest known usage was by the American author Charles Astor Bristed, in a letter to the editor published in The New York Times on January 11, 1863.

> The term "conspiracy theory" is itself the subject of a conspiracy theory, which posits that the term was popularized by the CIA in order to discredit conspiratorial believers, particularly critics of the Warren Commission, by making them a target of ridicule.

Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts by testTED on Friday February 17, 2023 @01:36PM (#34838543)
> the term was popularized by the CIA in order to discredit conspiratorial believers, particularly critics of the Warren Commission, by making them a target of ridicule.

Who popularized it is subjective.

What isn't subjective: the CIA indeed sent out a memo about this. It marked an increase in the use of the term in popular media publications. You can find it and read it.

Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts by ceejayoz on Friday February 17, 2023 @02:09PM (#34838915)
I just love that you lopped off half a sentence to invert its meaning to support your conspiracy theory. That's just beautiful.

> the CIA indeed sent out a memo about this

Wow, the CIA noticed something and sent a memo?

Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts by testTED on Friday February 17, 2023 @04:37PM (#34840902)
It noticed people questioning an official story, and it referred to them as conspiracy theorists.
Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts by testTED on Friday February 17, 2023 @01:33PM (#34838490)
Yes, all those drives in Utah are just for appearances.
Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts by ceejayoz on Friday February 17, 2023 @02:23PM (#34839084)
AT&T and the NSA are not the same thing.

AT&T is almost certainly not storing every text message long-term. The NSA likely is. It wouldn't be surprising if that's via a direct PRISM-style integration, but it still means subpoenaing AT&T for old texts is likely to not be productive. (As it was not productive in this particular case.)

Subpoena the NSA and they'll say "no, for national security reasons".

Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts by shadowgovt on Friday February 17, 2023 @02:32PM (#34839233)
I'm not even sure we can extrapolate that the NSA is storing anything like every text message long-term (as opposed to metadata, or samples, or the full transcripts of individuals targeted for investigation, or a machine learning trained weights set to flag messages that indicate someone should go on the targeted-for-investigation list).

6 billion text messages are sent per day in the US. That's about the volume of Google web searches, and I know from experience Google doesn't have the capacity to log every search or the logs of evaluation of every search. If Google lacks the capacity, I suspect the NSA lacks the capacity.

Re:Federal judge sanctions Seattle officials for deleting texts by GauntletWizard on Friday February 17, 2023 @04:34PM (#34840873)
* * *