News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by hindsightbias on Thursday February 16, 2023 @12:10AM (#34815305)
Comically wrong. You can drive by or fly over nuclear silos any time. They’re right off the highways and county roads. None of them are in restricted or prohibited airspace. You can rent an apartment in Great Falls and capture 1000X more sigint than a silly troll balloon. They have internet there too.
Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by californical on Thursday February 16, 2023 @12:22AM (#34815373)
They may not be restricted or prohibited, but it’s still illegal to gather information about them for the purpose of spying
Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by justsomehnguy on Thursday February 16, 2023 @12:31AM (#34815428)
Hey, psst, hey!

Just don't tell anyone what you are gathering for the purpose of spying. Just tell (if anyone would be bothered enough) what you are a blogg^W influencer and making a new TikTok.

Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by seanmcdirmid on Thursday February 16, 2023 @01:24AM (#34815719)
In china many tourist areas overlook navy bases. If a foreign tourist just points their camera in that direction, they are in for a rough time, perhaps even a couple of years in prison if they want to retaliate for something like the detaining of huawei CEO’s daughter. America is pretty benign in comparison
Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by tablespoon on Thursday February 16, 2023 @10:09AM (#34819653)
> Just don't tell anyone what you are gathering for the purpose of spying. Just tell (if anyone would be bothered enough) what you are a blogg^W influencer and making a new TikTok.

Yeah, like a Chinese national renting an apartment in some weird place and frequently "hiking" near missile silos with a bunch of unusual electronics isn't going to attract unwanted attention. The FBI would be totally fooled by your influencer ruse.

You know what's so great about spy baloons? They're things not people. Using them doesn't put any of your people at risk. That's, like, a consideration.

Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by partiallypro on Thursday February 16, 2023 @11:49AM (#34821200)
It literally is restricted and prohibited; this poster is just wrong. They might be surprised to know there are even drone restrictions over certain areas, any commercial drone pilot knows this and it's part of their test for certification. Some drones will even disengage if they are within a certain geofence, or you'll just go to jail.
Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by NoPicklez on Thursday February 16, 2023 @12:45AM (#34815510)
I think their overall point is that, there are multiple ways to skin a cat and just because it doesn't look nefarious doesn't mean it isn't.

If a balloon looks innocuous, then it might be a great tool to do something with.

Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by chucksta on Thursday February 16, 2023 @09:09AM (#34818810)
Good point, like birds aren't real https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birds_Aren%27t_Real
Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by partiallypro on Thursday February 16, 2023 @11:46AM (#34821154)
Every nuclear power plant has airspace restrictions, so I don't even know what you're talking about.

https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/where_can_i_fly/airs...

Spy balloons (and drones) are 100000% a thing. I think it's laughable that you can even try to argue otherwise.

As to why the US suddenly cares publicly, probably mostly political because the Chinese balloon was spotted by a civilian and there was a public outcry. That doesn't mean they aren't happening, nor that the governments across the world aren't aware of them.

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/40054/adversary-drones...

Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by hindsightbias on Thursday February 16, 2023 @12:32PM (#34821978)
> power plant

you're own link: "Drones are prohibited.. from the ground up to 400 feet above ground level"

This, charitably, is called moving the goal posts. I fly over/near a nuclear plant every couple of months on my way somewhere. I am not a drone. Pilots fly over silo fields and nuclear plants all day, every day.

Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by mrguyorama on Thursday February 16, 2023 @03:07PM (#34825112)
Your quote from their link is a boilerplate minimum restriction that applies when no further restriction is provided. Most places, especially "sensitive" ones have even stricter limitations. Go ahead and try and fly a drone 500 ft above a military airbase, you'll meet some fun people and have plenty of free time to pick up a new hobby.

Nuclear silos are generally not that sensitive, because they are all 60 years old and everyone can identify them on satellite imaging, but if you fly a drone near one, you will definitely be surveilled by some security, whether you know it or not.

Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by partiallypro on Thursday February 16, 2023 @05:47PM (#34827671)
If you bothered to read it's a ~3-mile radius from the plant, but sure. If you want to test your theory, go ahead and buy a drone and try flying it only 300ft above a nuclear power plant. As soon as you're found out, you'll promptly be arrested (if your drone doesn't already automatically shut off due to GPS geofencing).
Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by dang on Friday February 17, 2023 @03:15AM (#34832172)
Can you please make your substantive points without snark and swipes, and please not post in the flamewar style?

The HN guidelines ask you not to do those things, because they degrade discussion and we're trying for something else here.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by dang on Friday February 17, 2023 @03:14AM (#34832168)
Can you please make your substantive points without snark and swipes? The HN guidelines ask you not to do those things, because they degrade discussion and we're trying for something else here.

You did it repeatedly in this thread, and unfortunately have been doing it elsewhere too—and we've had to warn you about this kind of thing more than once before. When accounts behave this way, we end up having to ban them. I don't want to ban you, so if you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by thomasjudge on Thursday February 16, 2023 @09:33PM (#34829968)
I live in Great Falls, can confirm
Re:The US Air Force may have shot down an amateur radio pico... by dang on Friday February 17, 2023 @03:14AM (#34832162)
Can you please make your substantive points without snark and swipes? The HN guidelines ask you not to do those things, because they degrade discussion and we're trying for something else here.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

Edit: it looks like you've been posting unsubstantive and/or flamebait comments repeatedly. We end up having to ban that sort of account because it's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. I don't want to ban you, so it would be good if you'd fix this going forward.