Re:Speech is violence? Not if we want a liberal, intellectua...
by s1artibartfast on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @06:45PM
(#34812676)
I was speaking about what the law philosophically cares about - how it was crafted.
When it comes to this example, it is a lot more clear. I can write a book on why you should shoot up schools and it would be protected. Reasonable does not come in to that part of the question.
Re:Speech is violence? Not if we want a liberal, intellectua...
by giantg2 on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @06:50PM
(#34812724)
Sure, I'm just saying in practice the ideals that the laws were crafted on tend to go out the window - to the point that the law (through opinion) contradicts the written statute.
Re:Speech is violence? Not if we want a liberal, intellectua...
by freejazz on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @08:15PM
(#34813604)
>"Reasonable" can be whatever the judge/jury say it is."
Not really. The boundaries of "reasonable" are... wait for... it reasonableness.
I.e. if a jury or a judge isn't reasonable, then an appeals court can overturn it. A judge or jury is not given free reign to determine anything to be reasonable.
In short, "reasonable" means nothing until the people in power tell you what it means.