Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by JohnFen on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @05:17PM (#34811539)

I never asserted that they couldn't do harm. I asserted that they don't think, and therefore cannot intend to do harm. They have no intentions whatsoever.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by elbear on Thursday February 16, 2023 @02:26AM (#34816013)

What does it matter if there was intention or not as long as harm was done?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by fragmede on Thursday February 16, 2023 @02:44AM (#34816105)

If a person causes harm, we care a lot. We make the distinction between manslaughter, first and second degree murder, as well as adding hate crimes penalties on top if the victim was chosen for a specific set of recognized reasons. ML models aren't AGI, so it's not clear how we'd apply it, but there's precedent for it mattering.

[ Parent | on HN ]