Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by theamk on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @11:21AM (#34805959)

"where is avatar showing today" is not a stupid thing, and I'd expect a correct answer there.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by iinnPP on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @11:42AM (#34806430)

Training data is 2021.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by qbasic_forever on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @11:46AM (#34806548)

A search engine that only knows about the world a year ago from when it was last trained is frankly useless.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by iinnPP on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @11:54AM (#34806731)

Frankly? What about looking for specific 2010 knowledge? It's not useless and it's not fair to say it is, frankly.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by minimaxir on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @11:58AM (#34806813)

Unlike ChatGPT, the value proposition of the new Bing is that it can get recent data, so presumably Microsoft/OpenAI made tweaks to allow that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by vkou on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @01:12PM (#34808092)

Then don't ship the thing as a search assistant, ship it as a toy for anyone looking for a weird nostalgic throwback to '21.

[ Parent | on HN ]