News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Price of a Harvard Lawyer by cxr on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @09:56AM (#34804639)
This seems remarkably close to those instances where someone describes a problem and then a respondent just repeats the problem back as if to frame it as an argument when it's really just an empty response. Viz:

> [We only] ensure that the system operates according to the specification

Right. That's the substance of the complaint.

Re:The Price of a Harvard Lawyer by akomtu on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @12:04PM (#34806925)
Another way to look at this is the "goodness conservation" law: if you enable some lawyers to be agents of good, you'll also enable some lawyers to be agents of evil; you can't empower just one side. The alternative is when everyone is neutral.
Re:The Price of a Harvard Lawyer by diag on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @02:19PM (#34809122)
But neutrality is imaginary in reality. Because law is a flawed reflection of society's morality