The correct answer would be to sell it as a $54M jackpot then. Or require the organizers to pay the difference out of pocket.

Is this an attempt at humor?

No?

If you don't know the answer, underestimate and overdeliver. Or consider whether you should be doing it in the first place.

The problem is that underestimating will cause fewer tickets to be sold.

I can imagine a perverse population of customers whose elasticity function prevents the estimate from ever being correct by always buying too many tickets.

A business being less successful if they don't misrepresent reality is perfectly fine to me.

> A business being less successful if they don't misrepresent reality is perfectly fine to me

We are talking about a state government backed lottery, not a business.

> I did not know that shit was estimated.

> If you don't know the answer, underestimate and overdeliver.

Make up your mind, is estimating bad or not? The example I gave isn’t the only possible outcome, some times it’s 1-2% more than quoted when more tickets were sold.

Err, what? I never posted that first quote?

And even then, it's perfectly consistent to say that estimating is only OK if it doesn't make you look better than reality.

Or just label it as estimated until tech is developed to determine how many tickets will be sold in advance?

It was a joke by the inimitable Mitch Hedberg.