News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Shrinkflation, SanDisk Style by Nullabillity on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @10:06AM (#34804788)
No?

If you don't know the answer, underestimate and overdeliver. Or consider whether you should be doing it in the first place.

Re:Shrinkflation, SanDisk Style by oneeyedpigeon on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @10:16AM (#34804901)
The problem is that underestimating will cause fewer tickets to be sold.
Re:Shrinkflation, SanDisk Style by Y_Y on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @10:39AM (#34805218)
I can imagine a perverse population of customers whose elasticity function prevents the estimate from ever being correct by always buying too many tickets.
Re:Shrinkflation, SanDisk Style by mrguyorama on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @01:08PM (#34808003)
A business being less successful if they don't misrepresent reality is perfectly fine to me.
Re:Shrinkflation, SanDisk Style by jsjohnst on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @11:17PM (#34814950)
> A business being less successful if they don't misrepresent reality is perfectly fine to me

We are talking about a state government backed lottery, not a business.

Re:Shrinkflation, SanDisk Style by jsjohnst on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @11:22PM (#34814980)
> I did not know that shit was estimated.

> If you don't know the answer, underestimate and overdeliver.

Make up your mind, is estimating bad or not? The example I gave isn’t the only possible outcome, some times it’s 1-2% more than quoted when more tickets were sold.

Re:Shrinkflation, SanDisk Style by Nullabillity on Friday February 17, 2023 @09:57AM (#34835360)
Err, what? I never posted that first quote?

And even then, it's perfectly consistent to say that estimating is only OK if it doesn't make you look better than reality.