News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on What Is ChatGPT Doing and Why Does It Work?. Parent comment

Re:What Is ChatGPT Doing and Why Does It Work? by SilverBirch on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @05:26AM (#34802026)
Such a hacker news comment. The title isn't a question Stephen Wolfram is asking you a question, it's the title of an article he's written that answers the question.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What Is ChatGPT Doing and Why Does It Work? by bmacho on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @06:32AM (#34802474)
Rather a typical human comment to spread their own believes when they have a chance.

An ideal hacker news comment would be the exact opposite, it would refer to the article.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What Is ChatGPT Doing and Why Does It Work? by spion on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @10:25AM (#34805006)
The article itself admits (after covering the basics) that we don't really know. I thought it would be interesting to post some additional cool papers written by folks trying to figure out what's going on.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What Is ChatGPT Doing and Why Does It Work? by matthewdgreen on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @07:50AM (#34803121)
It's a discussion site. There are transformer models that can summarize Wolfram if that's all you want.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What Is ChatGPT Doing and Why Does It Work? by l33tman on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @08:48AM (#34803716)
He doesn't answer the question, he writes a meandering 20k word blog post where every 5 paragraphs he assumes nobody else understands parts just because he doesn't and writes that "nobody knows" etc. Very annoying style tbh..
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What Is ChatGPT Doing and Why Does It Work? by sebzim4500 on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @01:04PM (#34807953)
What exactly do you think the point of this site is, if not to discuss the question raised in the article?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:What Is ChatGPT Doing and Why Does It Work? by JW_00000 on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @03:43PM (#34810286)
Discussing the contents of the article, instead of only its title. OP seems to have taken just the question and provided his own answer, without relating back to anything raised in the article.
[ Parent | on HN ]