Re:Whistleblowers Take Note: Don’t Trust Cropping Tools
by Something1234 on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @12:38PM
(#34792918)
Can you really trust photocopiers with the microdots they encode nowadays?
Re:Whistleblowers Take Note: Don’t Trust Cropping Tools
by jaywalk on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @12:52PM
(#34793096)
If all you're worried about is redaction and not anonymity, a photocopier is perfectly fine for the job.
Re:Whistleblowers Take Note: Don’t Trust Cropping Tools
by Something1234 on Friday February 17, 2023 @08:46PM
(#34843010)
This about anonymity applies for whistleblowers which the forwarded article was about.
Re:Whistleblowers Take Note: Don’t Trust Cropping Tools
by sokoloff on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @01:28PM
(#34793741)
Aren't those only in color photocopiers/printers (relying on the lesser visibility of yellow ink)?
Re:Whistleblowers Take Note: Don’t Trust Cropping Tools
by billiallards on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @03:15PM
(#34795336)
Not sure I would rely on that, but Xerox's docs state that the requirement was introduced as an anti-counterfeit measure by some governments. Counterfeiting currency probably wouldn't be a concern with B&W printers.
Most banknotes are not printed on ordinary paper, but it doesn't stop people from trying. Printers which produce those dots will also usually refuse to print high-resolution pictures of dollar bills.
Re:Whistleblowers Take Note: Don’t Trust Cropping Tools
by LarryMullins on Tuesday February 14, 2023 @02:03PM
(#34794290)
> a permanent marker
Or better yet, an exacto blade. If the "black and white" photocopier is actually grayscale, then you could get text leaking through the marker if you play around with the image contrast.
Though the overall lesson of the story is good: analog redactions with a permanent market and a b&w photocopier are recommended for anybody without 100% confidence in their tools.