Re:In Defense of Not-Invented-Here Syndrome (2001)
by noitpmeder on Monday February 13, 2023 @06:03PM
(#34782231)
I've definitely seen this in the wild -- certain accounts here post long-winded responses that at first glance seem very technical and hard to understand, but after a closer reading reveal it's just a mismatch of jargon intermixed with tangents.
See here, for one example: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=Cullinet