SQLite WASM: Something subtle in the browser

Re:SQLite WASM: Something subtle in the browser by CharlesW on Monday February 13, 2023 @02:05PM (#34778521)

> The standard was tightly coupled to the SQLite implementation…

I don't understand why this is a problem. It's in literally everything but my browsers, is 1/18th the size of Apple's home page (500 KB, while Chrome is a 1GB binary on my machine), and is tested far better than any browser.

> …which was a problem for any browser that could not just bundle SQLite.

What's a scenario where a browser can't just bundle SQLite?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SQLite WASM: Something subtle in the browser by Widdershin on Monday February 13, 2023 @04:03PM (#34780430)

Firefox already used SQLite internally for history as well, I wonder if any other browsers do the same.

[ Parent | on HN ]