News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Debian Privacy Issues by alkonaut on Monday February 13, 2023 @10:57AM (#34775151)
So checking for updates without sending any identifier counts, since it transmits the fact you did in fact run the application, and it's not strictly necessary.

I can see the point but it seems hard to draw the line for every single feature at the precise point of "does a network connection". For some programs there is quite a grayscale of what's "necessary" (i.e. needed) and what isn't.

Re:Debian Privacy Issues by zajio1am on Monday February 13, 2023 @11:10AM (#34775366)
I agree that in some cases there is a grayscale because what is an important behavior for some users may be unnecessary for others. For example, i could accept that incremental search using Google when text is entered to address bar in a browser could be considered both useful feature and privacy violation depends on user expectations.

But i also think there are some clear lines, like if a tool is not expected to use network at all, it should not use it. If a tool is expected to communicate just with explicitly specified hosts, it should not communicate with third-parties, ...