Go claims telemetry objectors arguing in bad faith and violating Code of Conduct

Re:Go claims telemetry objectors arguing in bad faith and vi... by acdha on Monday February 13, 2023 @09:24AM (#34773714)

That's not the problem they talking about. It would be useful in some cases (and I'd be surprised if they haven't already considered experiments along those lines) but what you have on GitHub doesn't easily tell them about your build or runtime environments.

Here's a long list of questions Russ Cox was interested in - notice how many of them would really want something like “what is your CI configuration?”, and consider that while they could sample GitHub Actions configuration that doesn't tell them anything about the much more varied set of projects who don't use that service:

https://research.swtch.com/telemetry-uses

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Go claims telemetry objectors arguing in bad faith and vi... by api on Monday February 13, 2023 @05:14PM (#34781539)

That's a very forced, contrived, un-impressive list. It reads like someone told them "hey, we want telemetry, please make up a list of uses that will sound plausible to programmers to justify it. Be sure to use big words like histogram a lot to shut down objections by sounding real smart."

Most of these things are in the category of bug prioritization. Why don't you... you know... talk to users?

If you want some statistics (oh sorry, histograms), maybe pull down the gigabytes and gigabytes of Go code residing on public repositories and places like GitHub and analyze all that. That'll tell you a ton about how people structure their projects, what architectures they target, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]