News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by bison3 on Saturday February 11, 2023 @08:49PM (#34758671)
From the tweet: "I am in direct contact with NORCOM and monitoring the latest issue over Havre and the northern border. Airspace is closed due to an object that could interfere with commercial air traffic — the DOD will resume efforts to observe and ground the object in the morning."

Seems like they are waiting to shoot it down in the morning.

Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by hgsgm on Saturday February 11, 2023 @09:15PM (#34758887)
Why is a member of Congress commenting and not the DOD or the Governor of Montana? Is someone spilling classified information to show off?
Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by triyambakam on Saturday February 11, 2023 @09:25PM (#34758947)
Because we're not being told the whole story.
Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by Dalewyn on Saturday February 11, 2023 @10:24PM (#34759387)
It's worth noting that in the US government hierarchy, the United States Congress is superior to the Department of Defense. Why? Because they (both House and Senate) write the laws stating who and what the DoD is, the House funds the DoD, and the Senate confirms appointments of officers.

Specifically with regards to Matt Rosendale, he is a Representative from Montana. He is in a position where he can demand (and will get, within reason) information from the US military and represent Montana in demanding and publicizing said information.

Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by hedora on Saturday February 11, 2023 @10:58PM (#34759569)
That is not how the chain of command works for the military. The president is the commander in chief, and senators do not report to him.
Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by wyldfire on Saturday February 11, 2023 @11:16PM (#34759662)
Ultimately their paramount allegiance is to the Constitution and the people of the United States. This can supercede the chain of command when Commander-in-chief places orders contravened by the People.

Congress performs oversight of the military and sets budgets, so they're briefed on operations like this which have some outsized political impact. It doesn't seem to me like these things should be a big deal but the rest of the people in the US seem to act like it is, so Congress is naturally very interested.

Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by Spooky23 on Sunday February 12, 2023 @12:53AM (#34760261)
He’s a freshman congressman buddying up with Lauren Boebert and joining the “rebel” GOP faction that was opposing the speaker.

It’s all about making noise to stay alive - how often do you hear from congressmen from Montana?

Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by peepeepoopoo3 on Sunday February 12, 2023 @01:15AM (#34760370)
Petty politics doesn't belong on HN. Please take this to reddit.
Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by ihatepython on Sunday February 12, 2023 @03:33AM (#34761074)
I agree with peepeepoopoo
Re:U.S. Representative Comments on New “Object” over Montana by Spooky23 on Sunday February 12, 2023 @10:47AM (#34763698)
Then a highly political story of shooting down balloons or whatever shouldn’t be front and center.