Re:Ask HN: Are Paul Graham's Classic Startup Essays Outdated?
by version_five on Saturday February 11, 2023 @09:24AM
(#34752512)
There was a list of Thiel fellows published the other day* and it struck me that the companies listed are mostly all pretty mainstream sounding startups and founders that wouldn't stand out on a list from YC or another VC. Maybe it's always been that way, I had in my mind that a program like that was trying to be a little more outside the box, but it feels pretty mainstream. I dont know what "next" looks like but the whole scene feels a bit like a copy of a copy of a copy now. (I'm not criticizing any individuals, just the relative uniformity of a scene that presents itself as high risk bets on genuinely new stuff)
* https://finance.yahoo.com/news/thiel-foundation-announces-ne...
Re:Ask HN: Are Paul Graham's Classic Startup Essays Outdated?
by intelVISA on Saturday February 11, 2023 @01:12PM
(#34754680)
Always funny to see the "modern YC startup" of two corp-types looking to offer the privilege of a crappy salary and tiny equity to a 'founding engineer' to build their product for them.
I would say I'm saddened but ultimately VC money far outpaced the small minority of people who can build things.
Maybe half of what PG said is out of date, but a lot of that is because he wrote about a fundamentally different kind of startup. I think those stillexist, just not at YC any more.