News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Did Mozilla Remove XUL Add-Ons? (2020) by roenxi on Friday February 10, 2023 @11:56PM (#34749732)
I shall clarify:

There is nothing wrong with having an irrelevant share of the market. Most software I use has a market share in the 0-2% range.

However, Mozilla screwed up quite badly because their response to being pushed out of the mainstream was to gut everything that would have made them an interesting niche player. Their niche could have been "OK, this isn't Chrome but you get an IRC client and a bunch of crazy capabilities that are fun at lan parties. We'll train the next generation of devs by giving them cool capabilities to experiment with!". Instead, the niche is the worse version of Chrome.

> metrics have shown over and over again that people didn't use XUL addons

Now the metrics show people don't use Firefox. Funny thing, life. I think it was a bad time to make a metric-driven decision.

Re:Why Did Mozilla Remove XUL Add-Ons? (2020) by rwmj on Saturday February 11, 2023 @02:45AM (#34750440)
This sounds terrible.

I'd be happy with a Firefox that didn't have stupid UI mistakes like making it impossible to tell which tab is selected. Or which didn't lose all my tabs in a crash. Getting the basics right matters.

Re:Why Did Mozilla Remove XUL Add-Ons? (2020) by st3fan on Saturday February 11, 2023 @09:41AM (#34752677)
Hey look another armchair Mozilla ceo who seems to know how to run the project better.
Re:Why Did Mozilla Remove XUL Add-Ons? (2020) by Certhas on Saturday February 11, 2023 @10:53AM (#34753387)
There is a huge difference between a world with a usable 2% browser (20% in Germany) and a 0.02% browser you are describing, that would in all likelihood also be incapable of actually keeping sufficient compatibility with Chrome to still actually, you know, browse the web.