Re:AI assistants: The convenient crutch for new developers o...
by blackbear_ on Friday February 10, 2023 @05:08PM
(#34746636)
That is a pretty common logical fallacy. It is actually a well-eatablished fact that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence", i.e., maybe the reason why there is no evidence is that nobody looked for it, or, as is the case here, because something is too new to find any evidence in either direction
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AI assistants: The convenient crutch for new developers o...
by brookst on Friday February 10, 2023 @06:26PM
(#34747448)
I think you’re mistaking the fallacy. That fallacy is best applied when someone asserts certainty in absence, as in the case of God.
If someone just asserts some random thing, it’s reasonable to ask for evidence. While their lack of evidence does not disprove their point, it’s certainly an argument for being skeptical about their point.
Otherwise I get to assert that every atom is a superintelligence, and your inability to provide contrary evidence is a point in my favor.