News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by exabrial on Friday February 10, 2023 @04:14PM (#34745930)
"Not sure what the object was"

"Shot Down using an Aim9x"

That actually narrows it down a bit. Heat seeking warhead.

Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by mikewarot on Friday February 10, 2023 @04:27PM (#34746113)
I just learned (yesterday[2]) about the rolleron[1], a stabilizing mechanism that prevents roll. It uses the airstream to spin up a gyroscopic mass.

The AIM9 is the only use I'm aware of.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolleron

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfzj3rRIVU4

Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by post_break on Friday February 10, 2023 @04:54PM (#34746464)
His long hair dangling by that spinning disc while he demos it... ugh.
Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by snerbles on Friday February 10, 2023 @04:20PM (#34746014)
Unlike previous Sidewinder iterations with a single-sensor thermal seeker, the AIM-9X has a thermal imaging seeker - it was used to shoot down the much larger balloon last week.

https://www.navair.navy.mil/product/AIM-9X-Sidewinder

Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by jollyllama on Friday February 10, 2023 @04:25PM (#34746087)
So it doesn't really narrow it down that much, then. Could be a plane, could be a balloon.
Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by themodelplumber on Friday February 10, 2023 @04:37PM (#34746242)
Could also be a flying promotional bearskin bladder from a local hunting lodge.

Which I have to say is where we may start to see a tragic lack of creativity unfolding on China's part.

Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by exabrial on Friday February 10, 2023 @04:37PM (#34746256)
Dang, you're correct. It still had a thermal signature, but it wasn't as definitive as what I thought.
Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by jnurmine on Friday February 10, 2023 @04:49PM (#34746398)
If it was not a drone, and "not a balloon", what could it be?

Assuming this was a drone, the "car-sized", "unmanned", "not a balloon", "not maneuverable" (!?), the operating altitude (40k feet / 13 km), and use of AIM9X (IR/heat seeking) should narrow down the possible drones.

Also, one thing I pondered: why F22 instead of F35 to shoot it down? Maybe a question of availability. But, at least publically the F35 operating ceiling is lower than F22, so I was thinking whether the object was in reality higher than the publically known F35 operating ceiling.

Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by Animats on Friday February 10, 2023 @05:15PM (#34746719)
> If it was not a drone, and "not a balloon", what could it be?

It could be an unmanned glider with some solar power. Several companies make those. Including Google, which was considering them as data relays back around 2016.

Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by mrguyorama on Friday February 10, 2023 @05:14PM (#34746708)
The F22 is America's superiority fighter, still beating the F35 in stealth and capability for anti flying things action. The F22 will probably be the default in most intercept circumstances.
Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by pmccarren on Friday February 10, 2023 @04:22PM (#34746039)
> Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder, Pentagon press secretary, told reporters Friday that an F-22 fighter aircraft based at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson shot down the object using the same type of missile used to take down the balloon nearly a week ago.[0]

[0] https://apnews.com/article/pentagon-shoots-down-unknown-flyi...

Re:Live Briefing on Alaska Aerial Object Shoot-Down by themodelplumber on Friday February 10, 2023 @04:25PM (#34746079)
It's considered a "system-guided" missile, not heat-seeking. It's much more advanced than the original heat-seeking concept and integrates additional optical technology in the fuse.