Re:Ask HN: Is anyone else getting AI fatigue?
by whiddershins on Thursday February 09, 2023 @08:31AM
(#34723619)
There’s a man who claims to have solved consciousness as a multilayered Bayesian prediction system.
See Scott Alexander for attempts to explain what is apparently impenetrable papers on it.
Re:Ask HN: Is anyone else getting AI fatigue?
by pixl97 on Thursday February 09, 2023 @08:49AM
(#34723802)
Sources for intelligence to be magic? I mean we know it's complicated but intelligence also spans the smallest creatures on the planet to humans. This points at intelligence being a reduceable problem that is layered. On top of that it's unlikely we need to model nerve behavior to get something intelligence like output.
Re:Ask HN: Is anyone else getting AI fatigue?
by HarHarVeryFunny on Thursday February 09, 2023 @09:06AM
(#34724039)
That's like saying that airplanes aren't flying since they're not flapping their wings. Intelligence is a capability - not a specific mechanism.
Consciousness is a subjective experience (regardless of what you believe/understand to be responsible for that experience), so discussing "consciousness/intelligence" is rather like discussing "cabbages/automobiles".
Re:Ask HN: Is anyone else getting AI fatigue?
by BulgarianIdiot on Friday February 10, 2023 @01:48AM
(#34736461)
Look at how Microsoft is instructing GPT to become "Sydney" and re-evaluate your opinions about what is intelligence:
https://twitter.com/marvinvonhagen/status/162365814434901197...
I don't think there is any because there is no functional model for what organic intelligence is or how it operates. There are plethora of fascinating attempts / models but only a subset implore that it is solely "statistical". And even if it was statistical, the implementation of the wet system is absolutely not like a gigantic list of vectorized (stripped of their essence) tokens