Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day

Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day by throwawaylinux on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @11:30PM (#34719765)

Ah, folk (or folks) that would make sense. I thought that was always a non-gendered term but I'd better not question it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day by DiggyJohnson on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @11:53PM (#34719914)

Folks is non-gendered, that’s why the “folx” terminology is seen as pandering / virtue signaling / etc. by many, many people. Re: Latinx.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day by TchoBeer on Thursday February 09, 2023 @12:09AM (#34720015)

I'm pretty sure it's just a fun way to spell folks

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day by liamN on Thursday February 09, 2023 @01:27AM (#34720410)

I agree that folx doesnt make sense as a nongendered term, but Latinx is used because Latino/Latina IS (traditionally) gendered.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day by d1str0 on Thursday February 09, 2023 @01:38AM (#34720471)

Even though Latinos don’t like the term because it’s whitewashing their culture.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day by chihuahua on Thursday February 09, 2023 @12:00AM (#34719960)

"folks" is non-gendered, but it does not have the virtual signaling properties of "folx" which is all about increasing inclusivity to heights that were previously unheard of.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day by adamisom on Thursday February 09, 2023 @01:18AM (#34720363)

how synergistic

[ Parent | on HN ]