Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day
by throwawaylinux on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @11:30PM
(#34719765)
Ah, folk (or folks) that would make sense. I thought that was always a non-gendered term but I'd better not question it.
Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day
by DiggyJohnson on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @11:53PM
(#34719914)
Folks is non-gendered, that’s why the “folx” terminology is seen as pandering / virtue signaling / etc. by many, many people. Re: Latinx.
Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day
by TchoBeer on Thursday February 09, 2023 @12:09AM
(#34720015)
I'm pretty sure it's just a fun way to spell folks
Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day
by liamN on Thursday February 09, 2023 @01:27AM
(#34720410)
I agree that folx doesnt make sense as a nongendered term, but Latinx is used because Latino/Latina IS (traditionally) gendered.
Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day
by d1str0 on Thursday February 09, 2023 @01:38AM
(#34720471)
Even though Latinos don’t like the term because it’s whitewashing their culture.
Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day
by chihuahua on Thursday February 09, 2023 @12:00AM
(#34719960)
"folks" is non-gendered, but it does not have the virtual signaling properties of "folx" which is all about increasing inclusivity to heights that were previously unheard of.
Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day
by adamisom on Thursday February 09, 2023 @01:18AM
(#34720363)
how synergistic
Re:Twitter starts limiting how many Tweets you can post per Day
by arghandugh on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @11:50PM
(#34719891)
It’s a silly internet spelling of “folks” that’s been around for three decades - don’t overthink this.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/a40314411/folx-meaning...
TIL