Re:Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service's 2023 Security Report
by ceejayoz on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @04:00PM
(#34715065)
> But they were forced and incentivized to give them up.
Sure. Russia later reneged on the incentives by invading Ukraine (repeatedly!). Thus, relevant.
> But this is inconclusive. On one hand, Russia did invade Ukraine, but didn’t invade Kazakhstan or Belarus.
"What about all the murders I didn't do?" isn't a great defense.
> And the agreement is not an official treaty, is not legally binding and doesn’t have an enforcement mechanism.
Cool, then they can stop whining about the supposed NATO "agreement" not to expand, which was not an official treaty, not legally binding, and doesn't have an enforcement mechanism.
Sure. Russia later reneged on the incentives by invading Ukraine (repeatedly!). Thus, relevant.
> But this is inconclusive. On one hand, Russia did invade Ukraine, but didn’t invade Kazakhstan or Belarus.
"What about all the murders I didn't do?" isn't a great defense.
> And the agreement is not an official treaty, is not legally binding and doesn’t have an enforcement mechanism.
Cool, then they can stop whining about the supposed NATO "agreement" not to expand, which was not an official treaty, not legally binding, and doesn't have an enforcement mechanism.