News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Chemistry of ‘Yes Minister’ (2017) by marcosdumay on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @12:49PM (#34711801)
It doesn't say they are pointless. It says one would never use them (there is no worst case scenario that wouldn't became worse by using them), but for them not to be used, one has to have them.

Or, basically, it explained MAD.

Re:The Chemistry of ‘Yes Minister’ (2017) by pixl97 on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @01:59PM (#34712959)
Also the salami tactics episode was great.
Re:The Chemistry of ‘Yes Minister’ (2017) by dingosity on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @02:16PM (#34713269)
Don't you mean the "british offal tube" episode?
Re:The Chemistry of ‘Yes Minister’ (2017) by labster on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @03:56PM (#34714981)
Brexit means Brexit.
Re:The Chemistry of ‘Yes Minister’ (2017) by smcin on Wednesday February 08, 2023 @07:40PM (#34718036)
Yes, you have to have them because your rivals do. In order to make sure each other never actually uses theirs. It's all perfectly logical you see.