Voice.ai: GPL Violations with a Side of DRM

Re:Voice.ai: GPL Violations with a Side of DRM by blincoln on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @12:03AM (#34688987)

I could be wrong, but I think you misunderstand how the GPL works. The GPL doesn't require distribution of the source code along with the binaries. Most organizations do that because it's easier than the other option, which involves providing the source code to users of the software on request.

So they aren't actually infringing the copyright unless they not only don't provide the source publicly, but also don't provide it on request for at least three years.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Voice.ai: GPL Violations with a Side of DRM by charcircuit on Tuesday February 07, 2023 @12:11AM (#34689016)

I was making a simplification. The license requires you to either distribute the source or distribute an offer on how someone can acquire the code.

   b) Convey the object code in, or embodied in, a physical product (including a physical distribution medium), accompanied by a written offer, valid for at least three years

It also would require the written notice which they didn't do.

[ Parent | on HN ]