News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stable Attribution. Parent comment

Re:Stable Attribution by mrtksn on Sunday February 05, 2023 @08:26PM (#34672043)
I agree, the situation is not ideal. These machines should't been trained on their work in first place.

Currently compensating the artists would be like the Pirate Bay compensating the studios for their production costs through the gambling ads they run. No new move would have been ever made if that was the case.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Attribution by bioemerl on Sunday February 05, 2023 @09:54PM (#34672717)
Isn't this machine never being invented a net loss for society?

I want my computer to be able to summon images out of the ether if I ask it for a picture of anything I could imagine. I could not imagine a positive system that would value such a small group of individuals over the need of the whole in a situation like this.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Attribution by pertymcpert on Sunday February 05, 2023 @11:28PM (#34673349)
The tech is out there. This whole discussion is a waste of energy, it will never, ever be undone. Focus on what's next, not what you've lost.
[ Parent | on HN ]