News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stable Attribution. Parent comment

Re:Stable Attribution by bioemerl on Sunday February 05, 2023 @07:44PM (#34671713)
Technically we do have examples of stable diffusion violating copyright, it will generate some exact clone images if you give it the right prompt and that image exists a few hundred times in the training data.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Attribution by yosame on Sunday February 05, 2023 @08:11PM (#34671941)
Just because stable diffusion can be used to violate copyright doesn't mean it only does.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stable Attribution by MacsHeadroom on Monday February 06, 2023 @11:28AM (#34679797)
For something like 11 images which were accidentally repeated hundreds of times in the training data this is true. They're more the exception that proves the rule.
[ Parent | on HN ]